WILLIAM MITCHELL COLLEGE OF LAW
FINAL EXAMINATION
COMPUTERS AND THE LAW
Professor Niels Schaumann
Wednesday, May 15, 1996 - 6:30 p.m.
2 Hours
STUDENT TEST NO.
1. For anonymity, use your assigned test number which was mailed to you.
2. Put your test number on this page and on all bluebooks.
3. If you do not know your test number, you may obtain it at the Communication Center or in the
Records Office (Cindy Egeness) during the first 30 minutes of the exam period.
4. If you do not use your test number, you will be deemed to have waived your privilege of
anonymous grading.
5. TURN IN YOUR BLUEBOOKS AND THIS EXAM AT THE END OF THE PERIOD.
*****************************************************************
STUDENT CONDUCT CODE
IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE CODE:
1. To use any sources which are forbidden by the instructor to complete an exam.
2. To submit as one's own work the work of another.
3. To engage in any conduct which tends to give an unfair advantage to any student in any
academic matter.
Knowledge of any violation should be promptly reported.
VIOLATION OF THE STUDENT CONDUCT CODE MAY RESULT IN EXPULSION
OR SUSPENSION FROM THE COLLEGE OR DISMISSAL FROM THE CLASS.
*****************************************************************
GRADUATING SENIORS: If you are a graduating senior, note this fact on all bluebooks and
this exam paper. DO SO CONSPICUOUSLY.
TYPING AREA: If you are going to type your examination, the typing area is located in the old Boardroom. You must return the exam to this room at the conclusion of the exam period.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
MATERIALS PERMITTED FOR THIS TEST: Maggs, Soma & Sprowl, Computer Law:
Cases--Comments--Questions (1992), with the statute supplement of your choice. In addition,
you may use class notes, outlines and other materials prepared by you or by other students, and
any material distributed by the instructor. NO OTHER MATERIAL IS PERMITTED.
1. This examination consists of two Parts, numbered I and II. Below the heading for each Part
there appears, in parenthesis, the percentage of the total test score attributable to that Part. No
matter how long you spend on a question, you can earn no more than the specified percentage of
the total test score for your answer. It is therefore wise to budget your time carefully.
2. Answer all questions only according to the materials we studied in this class this semester. And
remember to budget your time.
3. BUDGET YOUR TIME.
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS USING A PEN
DO NOT ANSWER ANY QUESTION IN PENCIL
Part I--Essay
(75%)
Instructions for Essay Questions
1. Write on only one side of the page.
2. Write on every other line.
3. Leave the left margin of the page empty.
4. Try to write legibly. I want to give you as much credit as possible, and I cannot give credit for
an answer I cannot read.
5. Citations to specific cases are not necessary. You should, however, cite relevant statutes and
rules.
6. Take some time to organize your answer. All other things being equal, a coherent response
will earn more credit than one that rambles aimlessly.
(55%)
Sally is a software engineer. Recently she left her employer of many years and started her own
business, developing "add-ons" for popular business applications like Microsoft Excel and
Microsoft Word.
The add-ons consist of programs that run concurrently with a "host" program, and add features
not found in the host. Thus, for example, Sally recently completed an add-on for Microsoft Word
that permits the in-place editing of fonts without exiting from Word. With Sally's add-on, the
shapes and spacing of letters can be far more easily changed than they could without the add-on.
One of the problems Sally encountered in developing her programs was the unavailability of
source code for the host programs. Without source code, it was extremely difficult for Sally to
learn the details of Microsoft Word's internal workings, leaving her to guess based on careful
observation of the program while it is running, and trial and error. Microsoft flatly refused to
provide her with the information she needs, although she requested it several times.
Six months ago, Nick Nebbish sold Sally software tools--that is, a set of programs--that would
help her with this problem. Using the tools is easy: Sally simply loaded the appropriate program,
and then ran Microsoft Word. By using Nick's tools (which, among other things, included a
"decompiler" and a "disassembler"), Sally was able to generate human-readable source code for
Microsoft Word, which saved her an immense amount of time and effort in finishing her add-on
font product. The source code is generated by Nick's tools was not identical to the code
maintained by Microsoft, but it was helpful nonetheless because it gave Sally a peek at the
underlying structure of Microsoft Word. By printing out the source code and reading it at her
leisure, she was able to discover the information she needed.
At a cocktail party last week, an acquaintance of Sally's told her that he thought that generating
source code for Microsoft Word was probably illegal. Sally became concerned and has consulted
you, her attorney. She explains to you, "I can't believe I am infringing Microsoft's rights. Not one
byte of my Word add-on is copied from anyone, least of all from them. What I'm doing is actually
helping them! How could there be anything wrong with this?"
You explained to Sally that you needed to do a little research on her question, and that you'd "get
back" to her. A little investigating has revealed that the copy of Word that Sally was running was
purchased at retail in a local computer "superstore." It was not copy-protected. The license that
accompanied the product reads (in part) as follows:
1. Grant of License. This License Agreement permits you to use one copy of the Microsoft software program included in this package (the "Software") on a single computer. The Software is in "use" on a computer when it is loaded into temporary memory (i.e. RAM) or installed into permanent memory (e.g., hard disk, CD-ROM, or other storage device) of that computer.
. . . .
3. Retention of Rights. The Software is owned by Microsoft Corporation or its suppliers and is
protected by United States copyright laws and international treaty provisions and all other
applicable national laws. Therefore, you must treat the Software like any other copyrighted
material (e.g. a book or a musical recording) except that if the Software is not copy protected,
you may either (a) make one copy of the Software solely for backup or archival purposes, or (b)
transfer the Software to a single hard disk provided you keep the original solely for backup or
archival purposes.
The time has come to contact Sally and to advise Sally on her activities with respect to Microsoft
Word. Has she infringed any of Microsoft's rights? Which rights? Which activities infringed?
Explain.
Essay 2
(20%)
The genetic structure of the human body includes an extremely long (+1,000,000 units) set of
DNA code, arranged in sequence. Various portions of that code of, say, 200-300 units each, call
for the creation of specific protein molecules that are active in the human body. Essentially, the
living cell of the human "reads" the DNA sequence and chemically fabricates the protein that
matches the instructions in the DNA sequence. The exact sequence of the DNA code has been
previously unknown.
Craig Ventor is a research scientist who has been robotically isolating the human DNA code. To
date, he has identified almost all the sequence of the human DNA code, but has little or no idea of
what proteins most of that code is meant to create.
One of Ventor's co-workers, Arthur Able, has created a computer program that can search the
DNA sequence and automatically find potential matches between portions of that code and known
protein molecules. The program uses Ventor's the DNA sequence as a database.
Ventor and Able file a patent application that contains the following claim:
I claim:
1. A data structure for use in connection with a search-and-match program, comprising:
(a) a standard 3 and one-half inch magnetic floppy disk;
(b) the floppy disk having magnetically encoded thereon the DNA sequence of the human specie;
wherein the DNA sequence is capable of being read by a suitably programmed computer.
Assume that floppy disks were well known in the art prior to Ventor and Able's work, but that
Ventor and Able are the only persons who know the DNA sequence of the human specie. Further
assume that the patent application contains a fully enabling disclosure of how to make and use the
claimed data structure.
Should claim 1 be patentable under United States law? Why or why not?
[PART II BEGINS ON THE NEXT PAGE]
Part II--Multiple Choice
(25%)
Instructions for Multiple-Choice Questions
1. For each question in Part II, choose the most accurate answer (whether or not you think it fits
perfectly). Print (do not write in script) the letter for your answer on the examination paper in the
space provided immediately to the left of the question.
2. Each question in this Part is worth the same number of points (2.50 points).
3. Although an incorrect answer will not earn any points, no points will be deducted for an
incorrect answer. This means that if you are unsure of the correct answer, it is to your advantage
to guess. An answer left blank counts as an incorrect answer.
4. Although I have tried to make the questions as clear as possible, objective questions are very
difficult to write. Moreover, law students under exam pressure are extraordinarily adept at spotting lurking ambiguities.
For these reasons, below each question there are three lines. If you consider it necessary to qualify
your answer, you may use those lines to write in any additional information that you believe I
should have.
The foregoing should not be construed as encouragement to qualify your answer. No "extra
credit" will be given for material written in these spaces. Similarly, no points will be deducted for
incorrect statements made in a qualification. If, however, students identify a material flaw in a
question, I may allow more than one answer or, if necessary, not score the question at all.
Definitions. Unless expressly stated otherwise, all references to: (1) the "Act" or to the "1976
Act" are to the U.S. Copyright Act of 1976, as amended through May 1996; and (2) sections, are
to sections of the Act.
____ 1. Computer programs may be protectible by the 1976 Act if they are:
A. In source code form.
B. In object code form.
C. Permanently embedded in a ROM chip.
D. All of the above.
E. A. and B. above, but not C.
A. Idea and expression are interchangeable, at least for most computer subject matter.
B. Verbatim and non-verbatim copying are interchangeable, at least for most computer subject matter.
C. Screen displays and their underlying code are interchangeable, at least for most computer subject matter.
D. B. and C. above, but not A.
E. None of the above.
A. The user interface of the program; the screens seen, characters typed, etc., by the user in using the program.
B. The non-literal aspects of the program code; those things that can, if copied, infringe the code, but that do not necessarily involve verbatim copying of the code.
C. The end result of applying the Second Circuit's "abstraction-filtration-comparison" approach to infringement.
D. None of the above.
E. A. and B. above, but not C.
A. Are absolute, and any infringement is per se unlawful.
B. Are created by a combination of Constitutional, federal, and state law.
C. Cannot be waived except in the most unusual circumstances.
D. All of the above.
E. B. and C. above, but not A.
A. The right to avoid disclosing intimate facts about oneself.
B. The freedom to act without concerns about what others may learn about one's past.
C. The right not to have one's name or likeness exploited by another for commercial gain.
D. All of the above.
E. A. and B. above, but not C.
A. The use of so-called "auto-capture" technology in data collection.
B. Carelessness or inattention on the part of persons collecting data.
C. Failure to appropriately verify data collected with respect to an individual.
D. All of the above.
E. A. and B. above, but not C.
A. Bob's oral report is a "consumer report" under the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
B. Bob's oral report is not an "investigative consumer report" under the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
C. Bob is not a "consumer reporting agency" under the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
D. All of the above.
E. Both B. and C. above, but not A.
A. May be prosecuted in the jurisdiction from which the transmission originated.
B. May be prosecuted in a jurisdiction in which the transmission was received.
C. Is protected against prosecution by the application of the First Amendment to computer networks.
D. Both A. and B. above, but not C.
E. None of the above.
A. Appear chiefly in federal law, because most state laws in this area have been preempted by federal regulation.
B. Are in most cases unconstitutional restrictions on First Amendment rights.
C. Are derived directly from the criminal provisions of the 1976 Act.
D. All of the above.
E. None of the above.
A. Rarely applies to crime involving computers, because of the manner in which the statute was drafted.
B. Is often applied in prosecuting copyright violators.
C. Criminalizes intention, in the sense that the federal offense is complete when a "plan" to defraud is formed.
D. All of the above.
E. Both A. and C. above, but not B.