IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION LAW
PROFESSOR INGBER
FINAL EXAMINATION
Spring 1996
This examination has four parts. The value of each part has been indicated and it is suggested that you consider this in apportioning your time. Each part may have various sub-parts. Please be sure to check the entire exam package to make sure that you have all the parts. No excuses will be accepted regarding an "inadvertent" failure to turn the page and thus failure to answer part of the exam.
If the exam is not clear for some administrative reason (illegible copy), let me know. If some substantive issue is unclear, make a note of it in the margin, stating the problem to the best of your ability. If you find an issue which I have stated in class would not be on the exam, note this in the margin and then answer the question to the best of your ability. If you find that a particular question lacks facts which are necessary to a complete answer, point this out, supply the facts which you believe are missing, and then go ahead and answer the question to the best of your ability.
It is important both to identify issues and discuss them fully. Your answers should apply to the principles of law and the policy considerations you have learned in this course, thoroughly explaining how the facts lead to your legal advice and/or conclusion.
As many of you know, President Clinton signed the Anti-Terrorism Bill into law on April 24, 1996. While you are not expected to be able to apply the immigration provisions of that law to this exam, an understanding of the significance of the recent events will unquestionably impress me.
As announced in class, you may use the green paperback West publication of selected statutes, regulations and forms. No other materials are permitted however attached to the exam is a listing of immigrant numbers available for this month to assist you in rendering up-to-date advice, as appropriate.
I.
(25 Points)
Select the Best Response
1. A decision by a Consular Officer to deny a visa is reviewable by:
A. The District Director of the INS office having jurisdiction over the alien's intended port of entry
B. U.S. District Court
C. The Attorney General
D. The Visa Office at the Department of State, but only as to questions of law
2. Which of the following is true about all LPRs:
A. They are aliens
B. They are entitled to become U.S. citizens after five years
C. They can be deported but not excluded
D. All of the above
3. An alien who enters the U.S. without inspection is:
A. Committing a crime
B. Has not made an entry
C. Is subject to an exclusion hearing
D. None of the above
4. An applicant for asylum:
A. Is always physically present in the U.S.
B. Has the burden of proof
C. Can be denied asylum if he/she has committed a serious non-political crime
D. All of the above
5. The following individuals may be subject to deportation:
A. A naturalized USC found guilty of rape and murder
B. A native of Canada living in Minneapolis as an LPR since 1975
C. Both of the above
D. None of the above
6. In deportation cases, the burden of proof is:
A. Generally on the Immigration Judge
B. Generally on the alien
C. Beyond a reasonable doubt (the standard, that is)
D. Clear, convincing, and unequivocal (the standard, that is)
7. When the U.S. Department of Labor issues a Labor Certification, it:
A. Entitles the alien to work
B. Certifies that there is a shortage of US. workers
C Is required of all aliens who intend to work in the U.S.
D. Cannot be obtained if the alien is outside of the U.S.
8. When an alien becomes an LPR he/she may lose this status by:
A. Returning to their native country for eight months
B. Traveling around the world with a passport from their native country
C. Accepting employment in Mexico or Canada for two years
D. Losing their wallet with the card in it
9. Which of the following statements are true:
A. An immediate relative is always eligible for adjustment of status
B. The spouse of a LPR is entitled to apply for immediate relative status
C. All parents of USCs are eligible to be classified as immediate relatives
D. None of the above
10. Which of the following aliens is required to be the beneficiary of a Labor Certification in order to qualify for a green card:
A. A 25 year-old native of El Salvador whose brother is a USC
B. A 65 year-old native of Canada whose son is an LPR
C. A 17 year-old single female born in Sweden whose father will soon be a LPR
D. A 30 year-old Frenchman being transferred to the U.S. by his multinational employer on an L-1 visa
11. Which of the following is not considered to be "relief from deportation":
A Voluntary departure
B. Adjustment of Status
C. Suspension of deportation
D Obtaining approval of a Labor Certification
12. A Apriority date@ for purposes of the system of numerical preferences is established when:
A. A Relative Petition is approved by the U.S. Embassy
B. An Application for Labor Certification is approved by the DOL
C. A Relative Petition is filed with the INS
D. All of the above
II.
(25 Points)
Short responses are expected; No more than two paragraphs per question.
1. Discuss the different roles played by the State Department, the Justice Department, and the Labor Department in administrating the I&N Act.
2. Assuming an alien marries a USC, discuss the primary steps and timing for the alien to become a USC.
3. Discuss the most recent ground for seeking asylum.
4. List the ways in which an alien may become an LPR based on job skills without having to undergo the Labor Certification process.
5. What is the difference between exclusion and deportation?
III.
(25 points)
Essay
Having heard that you have some expertise in immigration law, a major employer in town comes to you with a plan to hire Brent Morrow, a native of Winnipeg graduating from the University of Minnesota this month with an MBA. Brent's graduate studies have emphasized information systems and prior to coming to the University he spent several years working for a large corporation in Vancouver working with computer design as it relates to information management. His combination of experience, formal education, and "street smarts" have resulted in an attractive offer being extended for employment to commence June 1.
Brent is married to Sally, a native of Australia. They have two children together, the eldest turning 21 next February, and the youngest who is seven years old was born in North Dakota. Brent has another daughter who was born out of wedlock nineteen years ago in Duluth. They have always maintained a relationship with each other and Brent has financially supported this daughter without letting Sally know. Sally, a registered nurse in Canada, likes the Twin Cities particularly now that her father, an LPR since early 1991 moved here, from New Mexico where it was too hot for him. By the way, being the wife of a student has not been all fun for Sally during the past two years. One day, while at Bloomingdale's, she was caught shoplifting cosmetics resulting in a fine of $150.
You have learned all of this information during a meeting with the employer, Brent and Sally. Brent and Sally want to live in the US the rest of their lives. All of the parties ask you to sketch out a plan for this to happen. Please discuss what can be done, what steps need to be taken, what issues are of concern, what is important to know, etc., taking everything into consideration.
IV.
(25 points)
Evaluation and Analysis
What's right or what's wrong with these assertions? You may choose one or several of these concerns to discuss taking a position one way or the other in support or opposed to these statement(s).
IMMIGRANT NUMBERS FOR MAY 1996
A. STATUTORY NUMBERS (This communication provides priority dates and other transitional information as taken from the State Department's Visa Bulletin released April 9, 1996.)
On the following chart, the listing of a date for any class indicates that the class is oversubscribed; AC@ means current, i.e., numbers are available for all qualified applicants; and AU@ means unavailable, i.e., no numbers are available.
|
PREFERENCES FAMILY |
All Chargeability Areas Except Those Listed |
INDIA |
MEXICO |
PHILIPPINES |
|
1st |
C |
C |
01APR95 |
18MAR86 |
|
2A |
01DEC92 |
01DEC92 |
01MAY92 |
01DEC92 |
|
2B |
01JAN91 |
01JAN91 |
01JAN91 |
01JAN91 |
|
3rd |
01AUG93 |
01AUG93 |
15OCT87 |
15FEB85 |
|
4th |
15FEB88 |
08OCT84 |
01JUL85 |
01OCT77 |
*NOTE: For MAY, 2A numbers EXEMPT from per-country limit are available to applicants from all countries with priority dates earlier than 01MAY92. 2A numbers SUBJECT to per-country limit are available to applicants chargeable to all countries EXCEPT MEXICO with priority dates beginning 01MAY92 and earlier than 01DEC92. (2A numbers subject to per-country limit are "unavailable" for applicants chargeable to MEXICO.) (The three-year transition program which had provided additional visas for spouses/children of legalization beneficiaries has ended; petitions approved on behalf of such spouses/children continue to accord them status in the Family 2A preference, however.)
|
Employment - Based |
All Chargeability Areas Except Those Listed |
INDIA |
MEXICO |
PHILIPPINES |
|
1st |
C |
C |
C |
C |
|
2nd |
C |
C |
C |
C |
|
3rd |
C |
C |
C |
01DEC94 |
|
Other Workers |
U |
U |
U |
U |
|
4th |
C |
C |
C |
08NOV94 |
|
Certain Religious Workers |
C |
C |
C |
08NOV94 |
|
5th |
C |
C |
C |
C |
|
Targeted Employment Areas/ Regional Centers |
C |
C |
C |
C |
The Department of State has available a recorded message with visa availability information which can be heard at (202) 863-1541. This recording will be updated in the middle of each month with information on cut-off dates for the following month.