Coelman and Kieselbach
WORKERS= COMPENSATION - FALL SEMESTER 2002
FINAL EXAMINATION
1. 2.5
Hour Bluebook Exam
2. The
following materials can be utilized in the examination:
A) MN
Workers= Compensation Statute (green covered
materials);
B) Hand-out
concerning compensation rates, benefit adjustments, PPD schedules,
supplementary benefits, etc.; and
C) Calculator.
3. Please
use separate Bluebooks for questions 1 through 2 and for questions 3 through 4.
WORKERS= COMPENSATION - FALL SEMESTER 2002
FINAL EXAMINATION
QUESTION NO. 1: (25
points/37.5 minutes)
Kullas Construction Company was a general contractor on a
commercial building construction project.
They had entered into a subcontract with Bohn Construction Company to
provide laborers and concrete workers.
Kullas was operating under severe time constraints and had
to complete the project by August 30, 1999, in order to avoid contractual
penalties of $25,000.00 per day.
Jimmy Malloy was a long time
laborer with Bohn Construction Company who was working on the project. Jimmy was a professional boxer and he
obtained an opportunity for a fight in Las Vegas that would
pay him $400,000.00. He took the
fight on three week=s notice and immediately quit his job. He sent his brother, Terry Malloy, down to
report for work on June 28, 1999. Terry
indicated he was reporting with the intention of filling in for his
brother. The supervisor from Bohn
Construction okayed the substitution. Terry was working as a general construction
laborer and did a little bit of concrete work.
Terry was injured on the job
on July 11, 1999. Terry was working with
a Kullas Employee setting up construction
scaffolding. They were using the same
tools and were coordinating their efforts together.
The Kullas
Employee asked Terry to use a front-end loader at the other end of the
construction site to bring over materials for the construction of scaffolding
which was also at the far end of the site.
It should be noted that Terry had never received any training in the
operation of heavy equipment. He did not
even have a driver=s license. He
had been specifically instructed by his supervisor at Bohn not to operate heavy
equipment, although he had done so on numerous occasions prior to his injury
date.
Terry went and got in the
front-end loader and picked up the scaffolding materials. While heading back to the area where the
scaffolding was being constructed, he struck the side of the building with the
front-end loader, which caused several beams to fall, one of which struck Terry
in the head and knocked him from the front-end loader and severely injured
him.
While being treated at the
hospital, blood tests were administered which revealed that Terry had a blood
alcohol level of .27. Previous medical
records later obtained showed that Terry was a chronic alcoholic. Both Bohn and Kullas
employees gave statements indicating that on the day of the accident, Terry=s speech was slurred, his eyes blood shot, he reeked
of alcohol, and he appeared unsteady on his feet. He was observed to have tripped and fallen on
one occasion.
While in the hospital,
Terry, who had been an aspiring, but failed professional boxer in his own
right, blurted out that he crashed the front-end loader into the building
intentionally because he wanted to kill himself. He was despondent over the fact that his
brother was getting a title shot and his ring career was an abysmal failure. He screamed repeatedly AI could have been somebody!@
Bohn was uninsured for
workers= compensation liability at the time of the injury.
Discuss and analyze the
issues, potential claims and remedies, and defenses thereto.
QUESTION NO. 2: (25
points/37.5 minutes)
Butch Nash worked in a
foundry as a stone mason. In an
industrial accident on the job on June 8, 1997, Mr. Nash suffered severe
injuries to his low back and leg. He
ultimately was given an 18% whole body permanency rating for the low back and a
15% whole body permanency rating to his leg.
Mr. Nash=s date of injury wage was $900.00 per week.
Mr. Nash was on temporary
total disability benefits for six months from June 8, 1997, to January 8,
1998.
Mr. Nash then enrolled in an
Employer approved retraining program to become a CAD operator (Computer
Assisted Draftsman). This program ran
for two years from January 10, 1998, through January 10, 2000. During this time, Mr. Nash received 104 weeks
of retraining benefits.
Upon completion of
retraining on January 10, 2000, the Employee continued to collect temporary
total disability benefits from January 11, 2000, through March 1, 2000.
On March 1, 2000, Mr. Nash
started a new job as a CAD operator in Minneapolis. His starting wage was $600.00 per week. Pursuant to his employment agreement, his
salary increased to $800.00 per week after completion of six months probation.
On September 1, 2000, the
Employee was terminated by his Employer for sexually harassing the female CEO.
Mr. Nash,
lived in the Twin Cities. While there
were numerous CAD jobs available in the Twin Cities, the market had gone
soft.
The Employee was provided
with vocational rehabilitation. However,
in contravention of the rehab plan, he refused to look for work as a CAD
operator saying he did not have the temperament or patience for this type of
work.
On June 6, 2001, the
Employee found a new job as a professional masseuse for Lenora=s Massage Parlor, which was owned by his new
girlfriend, Alexandra. The Employee
worked 10-20 hours per week and was paid $10.00 per hour. He also received tips which averaged another
$100.00 per week.
You have been retained to
represent the Employer and Insurer in this case.
A. Discuss
the Employee=s
potential temporary total disability entitlement, and any possible
defenses thereto. Calculate exposure,
showing your calculations.
B. What
permanent partial disability exposure is there in this case? Show your calculations and discuss.
C. Assume
that the Employee=s date of injury was 9/1/02 rather than 6/8/97. Would the permanent partial disability
exposure be any different? Explain and
show your calculations.
D. When
is payment of permanent partial disability benefits due in this case?
E. Discuss
the potential temporary partial disability exposure in this case and analyze
potential defenses thereto. With respect
to possible exposure, show your calculations.
QUESTION NO. 3: (25
points/37.5 minutes)
Betty is a union iron
worker. She is a single parent and has
decided that she will only work 3 days per week in order to give her children
quality time. As a rule, her daily wage
is $200.00. She has worked for the same
company, Easy Construction Company, for 15 years. She has had the same schedule for 15 years.
On October 5, 2000, Betty
falls off of a scaffold and severely injures her low back. She immediately sees her family doctor who
recommends a surgical consultation. Five
days later, she has major surgery on her low back. Temporary total disability benefits commence
immediately.
On January 1, 2001, she is
released to return to work with a 5-pound lifting restriction with no
repetitive bending, twisting or lifting.
The treating surgeon renders an opinion that Betty will never return to
work as a iron worker.
However, the employer, Easy Construction Company, offers her a
light-duty job as an estimator which will require her to work 5 days per week,
8 hours per day, earning $10.00 per hour.
The job is within restrictions.
Betty promptly rejects the
job on January 4, 2001. She insists that
she will only work 3 days per week because of child care issues.
On January 5, 2001, Easy
Construction Company discovers that Betty has been embezzling funds from the
company for 13 years. Over the years,
she has embezzled over $1 million. A
criminal complaint is promptly filed against Betty for felony
embezzlement. She is promptly fired on
January 6, 2001, and her temporary total disability benefits are cut off by the
insurance company. Betty is arrested and
convicted of a felony. She is sentenced
to 5 years in prison. Betty will be in
prison until July, 2007.
On January 6, 2002, she
begins making license plates in prison.
Her hourly rate of pay is 25 cents per hour for a 3-day, 20-hour per
week schedule. Once again, Betty has
refused to work 40 hours per week. The
license plate job is within restrictions.
Betty does not reach maximum
medical improvement until October 5, 2002 with service of the maximum medical
improvement report on October 10, 2002.
Betty hires an attorney to represent her. A claim is made for temporary total or
temporary partial disability benefits from January 6, 2001 to the present and
continuing. Is Betty entitled to any
temporary total disability and/or temporary partial disability benefits? If so, for what periods? Calculate the exposure for temporary total
disability benefits and temporary partial disability benefits. Explain your
answers.
Calendar
- January
6, 2001 to January 6, 2002 52 weeks
- January
6, 2002 to December 13, 2002 49 weeks
- January
6, 2001 to December 13, 2002 101 weeks
- October
10, 2002 to January 10, 2003 13.4 weeks
QUESTION NO. 4: (25
points/37.5 minutes)
Bill Brickhead
is a machine operator. For the past 20
years, he has exclusively worked the Widgetmaker 1000
machine for a company called Widgets, Inc.
His usual work day begins at 8:30 a.m.
On October 5, 2002, Bill decides to go to work a bit early in order to
clean up the shop for an upcoming OSHA inspection. Bill has no role at all in any aspect of the
OSHA inspection. He decided that it was
a good idea to clean up the shop as a surprise birthday gift for his boss. Bill shows up for work at 6:00 a.m. and
punches the time clock. He then decides
to go across the street to get a cup of coffee and a donut at the Lonely Hearts
Café. He arrives at the Lonely Hearts
Café at approximately 6:15 a.m.
Bill proceeds to drink 5
cups of coffee and eat 2 dozen donuts.
While at the café, Bill engages the waitress in a debate over the
legalities of unannounced OSHA inspections.
The waitress is far more knowledgeable than Bill on this particular
issue. He becomes frustrated, takes a big gulp of air and swallows a donut. The donut then becomes lodged in his windpipe. He panics, bolts out of the café and heads
back towards the plant. While in the
middle of the street, he is hit and killed by a speeding delivery truck owned
by Widgets, Inc. Death is
immediate. He dies at 8:25 a.m.
You are an attorney for a plaintiff=s law firm.
The senior partner has requested that you draft a memorandum identifying
and analyzing the issues with a recommendation as to whether or not the firm
should accept the case.
738913