link to Mitchell home

Volume 37: Issue 1

The Future of Elder Law Practice and Recent Minnesota Supreme Court Decisions: Case Notes

Electronic copies of the articles are available below. If you do not have Adobe Acrobat Reader, please click here. If you would like to purchase this issue or subscribe to the William Mitchell Law Review, click here.

The Future of Elder Law

Rebecca C. Morgan
The Future of Elder Law Practice©

Nina A. Kohn
The Lawyer’s Role in Fostering an Elder Rights Movement

Dr. Israel (Issi) Doron
Municipal Elder Law: An Exercise in Legal Futurism

Marshall B. Kapp
Older Clients with Questionable Legal Competence: Elder Law Practitioners and Treating Physicians

Kathryn Tucker
Elder Law: Counseling Clients Who Are Terminally Ill

Alfred J. Chiplin, Jr., Christine Fung, and Gilly Knox
Medicare Coverage of Power Mobility Devices: Tips and Reminders

Kristina Ebbott
A “Good Death” Defined by Law: Comparing the Legality of Aid-in-Dying Around the World

Robert A. Mead
Unpublished Opinions and Citation Prohibitions: Judicial Muddling of California’s Developing Law of Elder and Dependent Adult Abuse Committed by Health Care Providers

Recent Minnesota Supreme Court Decisions: Case Notes

Jeff Holth
Civil Procedure: I Win, You Pay: Considerations of Efficiency and Fairness in Minnesota Appellate Litigation of Attorney’s Fees—T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. v. Bahr Construction, LLC

Daryl Fuchihara
Contracts: A Million Dollar Mistake—Business Bank v. Hanson

Courtney A. Lawrence
Criminal Law: Too Much of a Good Thing: Limiting the Scope of the Scales Recording Requirement to Custodial Interrogations Conducted in Minnesota—State v. Sanders

Christian J. Hansen
Property: Innovations to Historic Legal Traditions—Jackson v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.

Brian D. Bender
Torts: The Failings of the Misfeasance/Nonfeasance Distinction and the Special Relationship Requirement in the Criminal Acts of Third Persons—State v. Back

Copyright © 2011 William Mitchell Law Review
Member of the National Conference of Law Review

*Opinions expressed in the William Mitchell Law Review do not necessarily represent the views of the publication, its editors, William Mitchell College of Law, or any person connected therewith.