www.wmitchell.eduVolume 35: Issue 4
The Twenty-Fifth Anniversary of the Minnesota Court of Appeals and Evidence Law
Electronic copies of the articles are available below. If you do not have Adobe Acrobat Reader, please click here. If you would like to purchase this issue or subscribe to the William Mitchell Law Review, click here.
SYMPOSIUM: THE TWENTY-FIFTH ANNIVERSARY OF THE MINNESOTA COURT OF APPEALS
Chief Justice Eric Magnuson
Opening Remarks
Harriet Lansing
Twenty-Five Years of Doing Minnesota Justice
Sam Hanson, Jonathan Schmidt, and Tara Reese Duginske
The Minnesota Court of Appeals: Arguing to, and Limitations of, an Error-Correcting Court
Retired Judge Bruce D. Willis
Suggestions from the Bench: Things Judges Wish That Appellate Lawyers Would Do Differently
David F. Herr and Haley N. Schaffer
Suggestions from the Practicing Bar: Things Practitioners Wish the Court of Appeals Would Do Differently
Richard L. Pemberton and Paul S. Almen
Significant Weight: The Impact of the Minnesota Court of Appeals Upon Civil Litigation
Moderated by Marianne Short
A Panel Discussion: The Impact of the Minnesota Court of Appeals on Legal Practice
EVIDENCE LAW
Peter N. Thompson
Foreword
Ted Sampsell-Jones
Spreigl Evidence: Still Searching for a Principled Rule
Lucinda E. Jesson and Peter B. Knapp
My Lawyer Told Me to Say I'm Sorry: Lawyers, Doctors, and Medical Apologies
Keiko L. Sugisaka and David F. Herr
Admissibility of E-Evidence in Minnesota: New Problems or Evidence as Usual?
Professor Joëlle Anne Moreno
It's Just a Shot Away: MMR Vaccines and Autism and the End of the Daubertista Revolution
Stephen J. Cribari
Is Death Different? Dying Declarations and the Confrontation Clause After Crawford
Eileen A. Scallen
Coping with Crawford: Confrontation of Children and Other Challenging Witnesses
Copyright © 2008 William Mitchell Law Review
Member of the National Conference of Law Reviews